quantum:march_10_2024
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| quantum:march_10_2024 [2024/04/07 12:30] – created baw-geordie | quantum:march_10_2024 [2024/04/07 12:30] (current) – baw-geordie | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | https:// | + | ===== March 10, 2024 Annotated Agenda ===== |
| + | * draft a multi-agent utility function for the WG | ||
| + | * success criteria for the working group for multiple stakeholders required products for several people | ||
| + | * Short term | ||
| + | * generate resources on a timely basis | ||
| + | * do not burn out | ||
| + | * Populate RQ.com landing page - single page - by Friday Mar 22 | ||
| + | * populate Requisite Q website front pages by the time the simulations are ready | ||
| + | * develop corporate documents | ||
| + | * develop [[Investor Documents]] | ||
| + | * organize Paul's writings | ||
| + | * [[blog posts]] generate website traffic measurable by SEO that shows growth | ||
| + | * Long term | ||
| + | * Show that our documents are useful to running the company and getting investors | ||
| + | * Generate the option to come on board RQ full-time | ||
| + | * it is also the generalized utility function (e.g., minima, maxima, target, confluence of interest, required products, etc.) | ||
| + | * Products | ||
| + | * Create Project documentation tree | ||
| + | * Create Project Taxonomy | ||
| + | * Create Project Glossary/ | ||
| + | * establish housekeeping: | ||
| + | * backlog | ||
| + | * Gary will standup a RequisiteQ wiki under the https:// | ||
| + | * calendar | ||
| + | * Geordie will standup a shared calendar | ||
| + | * Working agreement | ||
| + | * Geordie, Nathan, and Gary are pleased to work together to define and articulate project narratives. | ||
| + | * catalog our understanding of the audiences and media for narratives | ||
| + | * We need to add a catalog of resources accessible on the wiki | ||
| + | * We have shared workspaces based on audiences | ||
| + | * Internal project team (Confidential access) | ||
| + | * Investors (Restricted access) | ||
| + | * Pitch Deck Evolution | ||
| + | * • The top 10 +/- 2deck (top-down approach) “What Amit needs, | ||
| + | * o Classic investor pitch deck | ||
| + | * o How can we array the data for each slide in the deck | ||
| + | * o What is the visualization | ||
| + | * Qbits, squids, in a helium bath | ||
| + | * Hardware Problem Space Solution Space | ||
| + | * o Amit will join the Sunday narrative working group meeting | ||
| + | * • The middle-out approach to drawing out the relationship between a top-down and bottom-up approach | ||
| + | * o our context | ||
| + | * o the problem space | ||
| + | * o the potential solution space | ||
| + | * o our product(s) | ||
| + | * Project Plans | ||
| + | * • Technical considerations (1 page briefs, top priority) | ||
| + | * o Outcomes (So what!?) | ||
| + | * o Foundational technology | ||
| + | * o Applications | ||
| + | * o Development path | ||
| + | * • Technical | ||
| + | * • Financial considerations | ||
| + | * o Budget template | ||
| + | * o labor considerations | ||
| + | * o contracting terms & conditions | ||
| + | * Market considerations (for-profit) | ||
| + | * Objective considerations (non-profit) | ||
| + | * Lessons learned provisional patents | ||
| + | * o Public (Open access) | ||
| + | * Recruitment | ||
| + | * Media resources | ||
| + | * • Audio | ||
| + | * • Video | ||
| + | * • Web site | ||
| + | * • Written content | ||
| + | * o Op ed | ||
| + | * o Magazine articles | ||
| + | * o Abstracts for national and international fora | ||
| + | * o Technical papers and presentations | ||
| + | * • Funding Development | ||
| + | * o Grants | ||
| + | * o Contracts | ||
| + | * o Financing | ||
| + | * Equity | ||
| + | * Debt | ||
| + | * Grants | ||
| + | * o Audience drives the presentation | ||
| + | * Non-profit entity typically has defined goal or program objective to achieve and we must establish relevance | ||
| + | * For-profit entity typically wants to understand the ROI both a direct monetary return and the potential for disrupting and/or making new markets. | ||
| + | * o Find the way to yes | ||
| + | * Only poke the bears we have to | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * - make a shortlist of necessary narrative materials | ||
| + | * - review existing materials for suitability | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * Things that we need to include . . . | ||
| + | * • Investor brief, accessible | ||
| + | * • Inspirational engagement brief, bigger than yourself | ||
| + | * • Relevant technical concept and applicability in one or more contexts | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * Priorities | ||
| + | * • Technically correct -- Paul | ||
| + | * • Emotional hooks – Amit | ||
| + | * • So what!? – Investors | ||
| + | * Concerns | ||
| + | * • Conceptual markers | ||
| + | * • Use cases | ||
| + | * • We need stories that provide conceptual entry points | ||
| + | * • Tell the story from the theory to the application and from the application to theory | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * | ||
quantum/march_10_2024.1712507421.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/07 12:30 by baw-geordie